Compton Scattering and Conservation of Momentum

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
21 replies · 18K views
Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



photon scatter angle is theta, electron recoil angle is phi

prove

tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Conservation of energy is the same as in here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scattering


Conservation of Momentum

In x :

p_gamma = p_gamma' cos(theta) + p_e' cos(phi)

In y:

0 = p_gamma' sin(theta) - p_e' sin(phi)

p_gamma'=p_e' sin(phi)/sin(theta)


Let's solve for p_e'^2 since we can directly substitute it in the energy term.

p_e'^2 = p_gamma^2 sin^2(theta)/ [sin^2(phi)cos^2(theta) + 2 sin(phi)cos(theta)sin(theta)cos(phi) + sin^2(theta)cos^2(phi)]

I'm not sure where the cot(theta/2) comes from which we want to show.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the problem at least set up correctly?
 
If I'm to prove tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)

Would you have any idea where the hf' disappears if you look at the energy equations in the wikipedia link?
 
In a frams S, two identical particles with electric charge q move abreast along lines parallel to the x-axis, a distance r apart and with velocity v. Determine the force in S that each exerts on the other, by use of the force law for a uniformly moving charge.



I would need a lorentz forc e law in 4 vector notation,

what is it? Then where do I proceed?
 
Nusc said:
If I'm to prove


tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)

Would you have any idea where the hf' disappears if you look at the energy equations in the wikipedia link?
Well, you have 3 equations (x-momentum, y-momentum, energy). The idea is to use those 3 equations to eliminate 2 of the variables -- hf' and p_e'. That will leave you with just hf, θ, and φ in a single equation. The problem is in working out the algebra to get there.

Nusc said:
In a frams S, two identical particles with electric charge q move abreast along lines parallel to the x-axis, a distance r apart and with velocity v. Determine the force in S that each exerts on the other, by use of the force law for a uniformly moving charge.



I would need a lorentz forc e law in 4 vector notation,

what is it? Then where do I proceed?
I recommend starting a new thread for this problem.
 
[tex] E_{\gamma} = hf [/tex]
[tex] E_{\gamma'} = hf' [/tex]
[tex] <br /> E_e = m_e c^2 <br /> [/tex]
[tex] <br /> E_e'= \sqrt{ (p_e' c)^2 + (m_e c^2)^2 } [/tex]
[tex] <br /> hf + m_e c^2 = hf' + \sqrt{ (p_e' c^2)^2 + (m_e c^2)^2 }<br /> [/tex]
[tex] <br /> p_e'^2 c^ = (hf +m_e c^2 - hf')^2 - m_e^2 c^4 [/tex] Conservation of Momentum

In x :

[tex]p_\gamma = p_\gamma' cos(\theta) + p_e' cos(\phi)[/tex]
In y:

[tex]0 = p_{\gamma'} sin(\theta) - p_{e'} sin(\phi)[/tex]
[tex] p_{\gamma'}=p_{e'} sin(\phi)/sin(\theta)[/tex]

Let's solve for p_e'^2 since we can directly substitute it in the energy term.
[tex] p_e'^2 = p_{\gamma}^2 sin^2(\theta)/ [sin^2(\phi)cos^2(\theta) + 2 sin(\phi)cos(\theta)sin(\theta)cos(\phi) + sin^2(\theta)cos^2(\phi)][/tex]
I'm not sure where the cot(theta/2) comes from which we want to show.
 
You still haven't eliminated pe from the equations yet.

I suggest changing the cot(θ/2) expression using the half-angle formulas (see my link in Post #3). Then the expression you are trying to prove will be in terms of θ, and you can stop wondering about the θ/2. Note, there are several different, equivalent expressions for cot(θ/2)
 
Where do you see to eliminate hf'?
 
Disclaimer: I have not actually solved this problem myself.
Nusc said:
Where do you see to eliminate hf'?
You can use the p_x and p_y equations to eliminate pe and get an expression for hf'. That expression can be substituted into the energy equation, eliminating hf'. HOWEVER -- the expression you get is very messy, and it's not obvious to me how to simplify it.

Another observation: if you take the energy equation and divide by mc2, the left-hand side becomes

1 + hf/(mc2),​

a term that appears in the result you are trying to prove. Maybe (I repeat: maybe) working with the equation in that form would help.

Have you recast the equation-to-be-proved in terms of θ, to get rid of the θ/2?
 
The momentum conservation equations can be written as
[tex]p \: sin\phi=\frac{\epsilon '}{c}sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]p \: cos\phi=\frac{\epsilon}{c}-\frac{\epsilon '}{c}cos\theta[/tex]

from which

[tex]tan\phi=\frac{\epsilon 'sin\theta}{\epsilon-\epsilon ' cos\theta}[/tex]

where ε and ε' are the photon energies before and after the scattering process. Replace the wavelengths with energies in the Compton equation to get

[tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon '}-\frac{1}{\epsilon}=\frac{1-cos\theta}{mc^2}=\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}[/tex]

Solve this last equation for ε' and plug back in the tangent equation. You should get the answer without too much algebra. Don't forget to use the half-angle identities for theta.
 
I've only gotten as close as:

[tex] <br /> tan(\phi) = \frac{1}{mc^2 (\frac{sin(\theta)}{2\epsilon + cos^2(\theta)/sin^2(\theta))})}<br /> [/tex]
 
kuruman said:
What is your expression for ε' when you solved for it?

[tex] \epsilon ' = (\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2} + \frac{1}{\epsilon})^{-1}[/tex]

ah I see now, let me fix it

[tex] <br /> tan(\phi) = \frac{sin(\theta)}{\frac{\epsilon}{\frac{2sin^{2}(\theta/2)}{mc^2}} +\frac{1}{\epsilon}}<br /> [/tex]
 
Last edited:
It still doesn't work dimensionally. It seems you have trouble adding fractions. Look

[tex] \frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}[/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}{\epsilon \: mc^2}[/tex]

[tex]\epsilon'=\frac{\epsilon \: mc^2}{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}[/tex]

Stick this in the expression for the tangent and see what happens. Be sure to add fractions and simplify correctly. If in doubt, do dimensional analysis on both sides.
 
I got it thanks.
 
Last edited:
thanks for such an impressive discussion.. would you mind to post the whole final equation on here please ? i got some misunderstandings i think..
 
I don't know if I understand your question. The whole final equation is already given in the problem statement:
Nusc said:
prove

tan(phi) = (1+hf/mc^2)^-1 cot(theta/2)
In other words

[tex]\tan \phi = \frac{\cot(\theta/2)}{1 + \frac{hf}{mc^2}}[/tex]​

If you're trying to work this out yourself, show us how far you have gotten and where you're stuck. Then we'll know how to help.
 
Last edited:
I just want to see the whole solution step by step with explanation in one post . so i can translate it to my own language and use in my lectures. if this is possible it would be great but if not it's ok. thank you again.
 
parazit said:
I just want to see the whole solution step by step with explanation in one post . so i can translate it to my own language and use in my lectures. if this is possible it would be great but if not it's ok. thank you again.
Unfortunately, it is against our forum policy to provide step by step solutions to problems like this.

It has been nearly 1 year since I thought about this problem, but I think you can simply work out the details given the following posts from this thread:

Nusc said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Conservation of energy is the same as in here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scatteringConservation of Momentum

In x :

p_gamma = p_gamma' cos(theta) + p_e' cos(phi)

In y:

0 = p_gamma' sin(theta) - p_e' sin(phi)

p_gamma'=p_e' sin(phi)/sin(theta)
The wikipedia article gives the Compton equation (and its derivation):

be96ab723fc40e67a894b51f9d5457d8.png


kuruman said:
The momentum conservation equations can be written as
[tex]p \: sin\phi=\frac{\epsilon '}{c}sin\theta[/tex]
[tex]p \: cos\phi=\frac{\epsilon}{c}-\frac{\epsilon '}{c}cos\theta[/tex]

from which

[tex]tan\phi=\frac{\epsilon 'sin\theta}{\epsilon-\epsilon ' cos\theta}[/tex]

where ε and ε' are the photon energies before and after the scattering process. Replace the wavelengths with energies in the Compton equation to get

[tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon '}-\frac{1}{\epsilon}=\frac{1-cos\theta}{mc^2}=\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}[/tex]

Solve this last equation for ε' and plug back in the tangent equation. You should get the answer without too much algebra. Don't forget to use the half-angle identities for theta.

kuruman said:
[tex] \frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\frac{2sin^2(\theta /2)}{mc^2}[/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{\epsilon'}=\frac{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}{\epsilon \: mc^2}[/tex]

[tex]\epsilon'=\frac{\epsilon \: mc^2}{mc^2+2 \epsilon \: sin^2(\theta /2)}[/tex]

Stick this in the expression for the tangent and see what happens. Be sure to add fractions and simplify correctly. If in doubt, do dimensional analysis on both sides.
 
it's ok, i understand you. actually this is the best way to keep our brains working :)
thank you again.